His formula worked well for the space in which he derived it – the Fogg Lecture Hall at Harvard University.
T = (V/Sa)0.161
T = Reverberation time for 60 dB of decay
V = Volume
S = Surface Area
a = absorption coefficient
While the formula established Sabine as the “father of architectural acoustics,” the formula was quickly found to be quite conditional. The accuracy varies wildly with rooms of different volumes, shapes, and Sabin content.
Modified versions were produced by Eyring, Fitzroy, and others, but the take-away is that RT formulas provide estimates, at best. Recommended further reading is Leo Baranek’s scholarly paper on the subject.
Four major conditions for reasonable accuracy of the Sabine equation include:
1. Low absorption (less than 10% on average)
2. Uniform absorption distribution (no concentrated absorption areas)
3. “Mixing” room geometry (major room dimensions not grossly different)
4. Large internal volume (small volumes are modal over much of the audible spectrum). This condition makes it more likely that the other conditions are realized.
Very few rooms meet the criteria for even reasonable accuracy of Sabine’s equation. That fact does not keep many modern practitioners from banking on the formula and using it to prescribe room treatment for difficult spaces.
A recent thread in the SynAudCon Member’s Forum reinforced the problems with using the Sabine equation in small spaces, such as control rooms, studios, etc. It is also important to remember that absorption coefficients have similar accuracy issues for the same reasons.
The absorption of a material depends on the sample size, sample shape, room size, placement, and other variables. Published coefficients are estimates at best.
Even with the conditions and inaccuracies, the Sabine and Eyring equations provide a very useful “first look” at the acoustics of a large space. They provide a benchmark that the results of more sophisticated approaches, such as ray tracing, can be compared to when formulating the approach to a system design.